Frequently Asked Questions
What is your approach to arbitration?
Parties choose arbitration to resolve their disputes for a number of reasons: because it's more efficient and economical; because they seek finality in order to move on in their lives or businesses; because it's private; because they want to choose their decision-maker. I try to ascertain the parties' intent and manage the case - from start to finish - accordingly.
What can I expect if we choose you as arbitrator?
I will learn about your case inside out and come completely prepared at every stage of the proceeding. Your initial contact with me will be at a case management conference, where we will map out in detail every aspect of the schedule, from discovery to potential dispositive motions to hearing dates. I have learned in my twenty years of serving as a neutral that providing an early and thorough roadmap is essential to the efficient management of the process. I remain flexible in responding to the parties’ needs. I am always available to resolve disputes that arise along the way; typically within 24 hours. I will ensure that you get the discovery you need to fairly prosecute/defend the case, keeping in mind the goal of efficiency. You will get an Award that thoroughly explains my reasoning and addresses each of the parties’ claims and issues.
Do you follow the law?
Yes.
What should I expect in a case management conference?
I work with the parties to map out and calendar every aspect of the dispute, including discovery, dispositive motions, status conferences, pre-hearing briefing, the evidentiary hearing, and post-hearing briefing. Through my years of serving as an arbitrator, I have learned that the more thorough the roadmap, the more efficient the arbitration. I distribute an agenda prior to the case management conference and ask the parties to meet and confer before we convene.
Will you consider and grant dispositive motions?
Yes. I follow the American Arbitration Association procedure of requiring the moving party to make a showing that the motion is likely to succeed and dispose of or narrow the issues in the case. If the moving party succeeds in making that showing, we proceed to briefing and a hearing on the dispositive motion. I believe that this approach meets an important goal of arbitration: to efficiently and economically resolve a dispute. The scheduling of dispositive motions is built into the initial Scheduling Order issued after the preliminary hearing.
Have you ruled for both sides - claimants and respondents?
Yes. I go where the law and facts take me, no matter who the party is. I do not "split the baby." The exception is when the law and facts demand that I do so, in other words, when each party has prevailed on their respective claim or counterclaim.
What is your approach to managing discovery?
In one word: proportionality. I adhere to the spirit of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b) with respect to assessing the need for discovery. It states:
Parties may obtain discovery regarding any non-privileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the amount in controversy, the parties’ relative access to relevant information, the parties’ resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit. Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.
How about e-discovery?
Nearly every dispute involves some - or a lot - of e-discovery. I have developed an e-discovery protocol that will be discussed at the initial case management conference. Actively managing e-discovery is central to controlling costs.
What kind of Award do you render?
I typically render a Reasoned Award. I want the parties to understand why I arrived at my decision. If the parties want some other form of Award, however, it is their choice.
Can we interview you? What about references?
Absolutely. The most important decision in an arbitration is the choice of the decision-maker. I am available to be interviewed by the parties about my experience, management style and process. References are also available upon request.
Why choose you?
I understand both the law and the arbitration process. I have been a litigator, in-house counsel, and an arbitrator. I manage the process actively to achieve efficiency and economy, and yet understand that arbitration is the parties' process. I am deeply analytical and thus able to understand complex legal concepts; yet I also actively listen to people and evaluate evidence carefully. I actively seek to improve my skills as an arbitrator - and am frequently asked to teach those skills to other arbitrators.
Do you serve as a mediator?
Yes. I have a facilitative approach, combined with strong evaluative skills designed to assist the parties reach their own resolution. However, I will not serve as a mediator in a matter in which I am sitting as an arbitrator.